Task 4

Software myths



Myth is defined as "widely held but false notation" by the oxford dictionary, so as in other fields software arena also has some myths to demystify

Software myths are erroneous beliefs about software and the process that is used to build it.

• Classifications of software myths:

– Management myths

– Customer myths

– Practitioner myths

SOFTWARE MANAGEMENT MYTHS

Myth 1: Electronic Quality Systems are only for big companies

This prevalent myth asserts that an electronic quality management system (QMS) is designed and meant only for large organizations with multiple sites. The fact is, that in such a competitive environment, it is mandatory for every organization to track and control documents, manage non-conformances, and adhere to regulatory requirements - whatever the company size, amount of locations, or number of employees. All companies must demonstrate the highest standards and quality to auditors if they are to be certified to a standard that meets industry regulations, as well as customer demands.

Myth 2: Deploying an Electronic Quality System can cost companies huge sums of money

The demand for quality management software has increased the competition amongst vendors. Companies can select an electronic QMS at an affordable price. Many vendors now offer less-expensive, cost effective quality management software through services such as on demand / SaaS, where the software is hosted on the vendor's serve.

Myth 3: Only Technical Personnel can use Quality Management Software

It is a common misconception that anything relating to software is in the realm of an organization's technical team. It gives rise to this myth that only IT departments / technical personnel of companies can handle and use electronic quality systems. The fact is, there are quality management programs which are designed for everyday users who are familiar with internet usage - programs designed to be user-friendly and intuitive.







Myth 4: Poor to no return on investment on Quality Management Software

When considering the use of a QMS, senior management will usually question the QMS's potential return on investment. Various studies show that using software for quality management can save administrative time, reduce printing costs, improve production cycles, speed up change control processes, and improve speed of response - all of which adds up to a considerable return on investment.

Myth 5: Risk of losing data with an Electronic Quality Management System

One of the more persistent myths associated with QMS systems involves the perception that the electronic storage of data is somehow riskier than retaining paper versions of the data. In fact, electronic documents are far safer than any other methods of documentation